Friday, October 5, 2007

The Spirit of Yosemite

A while ago, I took an environmental college course that included a trip to Yosemite. After our trip we had to make a presentation about certain topics, mine was about the spirit of Yosemite.

Here was my attempt to turn a seemingly bullshit topic into an interesting one:

---

When we were in Yosemite, ranger Dick decided to use analogies to help us remember and understand important concepts about nature. I will do the same in describing the spirituality of Yosemite.

If I drop this marker on the floor (demonstrate), does the marker "desire" to fall to the ground?
Obviously is does not desire, it is just following the laws of nature; gravity.

Similarly, a tree does not literally desire water nor does it desire to grow towards the sun. It does not have a consciousness like humans in order to make that choice.

We, on the other hand, can choose. I can choose whether I want to drink soda or water (or at least it may seem so).

Who exactly is doing the choosing?

We are, fundamentally, our DNA coding and certainly DNA does not choose.

The 'magic' happens in the gene expression. We get a product, like our consciousness, that seems as if it is beyond the laws of nature. This illusion is deeply mystifying and provocative.

Yosemite has this same mystifying property.

Just as the human DNA, Yosemite possess very objective mechanisms that strictly follow natural laws. Trees, plants, insects, etc all follow nature's laws flawlessly and consistently – just as a succulent deposits money in its bank account or how a tree lays off the branches at the lowest tier.

Despite the mechanical aspects of Yosemite, the whole seems greater than the sum of its parts.

Just like the human consciousness, a mystifying beauty emerges from Yosemite.

This beauty is very hard to conceptualize so I will make an analogy to clarify.

Imagine all of you were watching the play "Romeo and Juliet" for the first time. Only, the characters and the scene are going in super slow motion (almost frozen) and they are in the middle of the story. With careful scrutiny of the scene you can make certain assumptions, like the fact it is a play or what time period they are living in. You might be able to construct possible plots for the story. What is almost impossible to know, are the deeper meanings of the story. The irony, metaphors, humor, or social commentaries will be almost impossible to depict.

We are looking at Yosemite like we are looking at this slow motion play, we can only understand it superficially. Maybe our human mind is not capable of conceptualizing this spirit of Yosemite, either way; it has different effects on different people.




3 comments:

nicholas said...

A3DFX,

My name is IF and I just read your article about Yosemite and your analogy to a frozen moment of Romeo and Juliet.

I thought it was brilliant. I think you created the kind of metaphor that is inline with my own personal fascination with the idea of the now ... the ever present right now ... in contrast to the ever present forever.

I absolutely adore thought explorations such as this because I think these are important ideas dwelt upon by important people.

I dont want to take up too much of your time, but thank you for writing what you wrote because I think your fascinated by the kinds of ideas who from what I can tell are just starting to be explored.

A thought painting that I drew that you might be interested in, an idea that you might enjoy, is the following.

If this planet has all of the beings that have a sense of time and light in the universe, and if we are a part of the universe, if all of the beings that sense time and light cease to be, then what happens to the universe when there is nothing left to observe it?

Id be interested to know your response.

nicholas@whatisearth.com

Lior Gotesman said...

Thanks for your comment,

About your question, my answer may be a little anti-climactic. The universe exists independently of the observer. Like my previous post about meaning, I wrote about how meaning is imposed on objects in the universe. So without any observer in the universe objects wouldn't have meaning imposed on them and therefore it might be intuitive to think that everything will 'disappear' when all observers are gone.

Space and time don't get distorted every time someone dies. It would be a leap of faith to think the universe co-exists with the observer.

Unknown said...

I have launched a custom postcard and stamp store with a series of Vintage Yosemite Illustrations from more than 100 years ago. They are beautiful. Please stop by the shop and check them out. Here is a link

Custom Postcards and Stamps Shop